Search for: "Bounds v. Smith" Results 741 - 760 of 807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
Courtney Kube and Alexander Smith report for NBC News. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
Only in 1983 did the General Assembly amend Section 401(a) to add the 90-days-before-filing alternative (see Section 401(a), Supplement to Historical and Practice Notes, Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 40, ¶ 401 (Smith-Hurd 1985 pocket part)). [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
Therefore, the main objective of the proposals is to avoid a West Tankers’ situation and to preserve the prevalence of arbitration agreements in a constellation where a party initiates litigation in a (foreign) civil court although it is bound by an arbitration clause.31 The proposals aim to reduce the uncoordinated competition of parallel proceedings in different Member States and to prevent torpedo actions. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Smith emphasized his choice of a running royalty over a lump-sum payment. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
  There’s one footnote, citing four cases from three jurisdictions:  Smith v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am by CMS
This issue was considered earlier this year n the case of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm by Lowell Brown
”6 Another reason for the new emphasis on ensuring that actors, recording artists, athletes, and other celebrities are contractually bound to promote themselves, their projects, and the brands with which they are associated via social networking comes down to the value not only of the celebrities themselves, but of the people who follow them. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Leveling movements, civil strife, and fights over the bounds of the existing “constitution” (not typically a written “basic law” like ours but a regime of authoritative practices and, perhaps, foundational public legislation) lead to ad hoc emergency measures by new politicians. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
That is, one is looking at the Arizona rule independently of the question of how it fits with other states' rules.Bibb balancing - In Bibb v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
In Section 540F of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Congress directed the Department of Defense to conduct a feasibility study, and to report the findings of that study, on a potential new “alternative military justice system. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm by Schachtman
In 1944, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, held, in a silicosis personal injury case, that: “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in silica dust, a fact which defendant was bound to know. [read post]