Search for: "Court Employees of Public Defender's Office" Results 741 - 760 of 6,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The defendant was convicted of threatening a court officer under G.S. 14-16.7(a), and appealed. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:21 am
After both defendant surgeons resigned from their positions, PSG brought suit alleging that the surgeons violated the restrictive covenant by opening an office approximately three (3) miles from PSG's office. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Since 2017, you have taken the position that you have a "duty to warn" the public that President Trump presents a threat to public safety. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  While the Code historically allowed employees and other taxpayers to claim an itemized deduction for business, charitable or medical care related transportation expenses,  Section 11045 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Public Law 115-97, 131. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:04 am by Phil Dixon
During their conversation, the officer told the defendant that if he would turn over any illegal drugs, the officer would “take it . . . and leave,” and that the defendant would be “squared away. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:22 pm
Public employees are protected by a bill that amended the Labor Law to ensure they had that same protection. [read post]
The state (really) made the following breathtaking statement in its filing with the court: "press or public access to executions does not play any particularly positive role. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:12 am by Jon L. Gelman
"DefendantsThe defendants in the case were the NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, also known as the NCAA, and the Following NCAA Division I Member Schools as Representatives of a Defendant Class of All Private and Semi-Public NCAA Division I Member Schedules; DREXEL UNIVERSITY; LAFAYETTE COLLEGE; VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY; UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA; CORNELL UNIVERSITY; SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY; FORDHAM UNIVERSITY; UNIVERSITY OF OREGON; TULANE UNIVERSITY; UNIVERSITY… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:33 am by Jon Gelman
The court denied the motion, reasoning that a ruling barring Vitale’s claims would contravene public policy. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:20 am by Steven Cohen
  In addition, the defendants argue that Moninger’s analysis occurred two weeks after her certification as a forensic scientist and that she has only been an employee of the New Mexico Department of Public Safety for five months. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am by Liisa Speaker
Michigan Court of Appeals (MCOA) in Kevin Smith v City of Flint, No. 320437, a for publication opinion, affirms lower court grant of summary disposition on Plaintiff’s claim under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA) MCL 15.361 et seq.Facts: Kevin Smith, plaintiff and a police officer with the Flint Police Department, had been president of the City of Flint Police Officers Union since February 2011. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm
The court also held that the phrase “upon information and belief” can be used when the factual basis supporting a pleading is only available to the defendant at the time of the pleading. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:31 pm by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
  The defendants in this suit argued they were public employees as “controlled affiliates” for a housing authority apartment complex. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:26 am by Trent Dykes
Article prepared by and republished courtesy of our colleague Ed Batts; originally published here: http://www.dlapiper.com/en/us/insights/publications/2014/04/muddy-employee-incentive-issues/. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:56 am by Gary Siniscalco
Just days after reconvening its Select Task Force on Harassment with a public meeting titled “Transforming #MeToo Into Harassment-Free Workplaces,” the EEOC marched into seven different federal district courts, from Los Angeles, California to Mobile, Alabama and in between, and said “#MeToo. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The District Court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment and Burns appealed.The Court of Appeals held the First Amendment protects a prisoner's right not to serve as a prison informant or provide false information to prison officials. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 8:16 pm by Amy J. Traub
  The court ruled that the covenant was overly broad, as it barred the employee from soliciting any business from anyone who is a customer of the employer’s New York offices, without any regard to whether the employee had any prior relationship with the customers. [read post]