Search for: "Cure v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 3,205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
 The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am by Rosalind English
In the cases of L, P and R, the irregularity involved in the absence of pages following the sealed front page of their notices of appeal was capable of cure. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
The rising tide of open preprints, data, and article access is accelerating the pursuit of vaccines and cures, and some believe science will never be the same. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:22 am by SHG
  Via Doug Berman, his decision in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am by John Elwood
After the Supreme Court denied as moot the closely watched Second Amendment case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm by Derek T. Muller
States have the power to determine the qualifications of voters; there’s a plausible argument that includes the power to enforce qualifications, as the Supreme Court suggested in Arizona v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:14 am
  After a series of challenges, the United States Supreme Court approved the condemnation in Kelo v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am by Anita Davies
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]