Search for: "DISTRICT VENUES LLC" Results 741 - 760 of 835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2015, 5:41 am by SHG
But then, the reversal in Weev’s case ended up on venue, not CFAA. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
Etymotic Research, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Location of manufacture and decision to mark weight heavily on venue analysis for false marking claims; action dismissed where another qui tam realtor had filed an earlier suit against defendant: San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
Ambu A/S (Filewrapper) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Convenience of false marking plaintiff ‘in the business of litigation’ given little weight in venue dispute: United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, No. 22-37 This case delves deeply into the patent-FDA overlap and involves an increasingly common situation “skinny label” situation. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:09 pm by Robert McLellarn and Steven Gersten
  Generally, the automatic stay requires a party seeking relief against a debtor to do so in, and only in, the bankruptcy court, which can provide the relief sought or grant permission to pursue claims and rights in another venue. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 SAMARA PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, LLC AND JOSEPH ONWUTEAKA, Appellants,v.NEDA ZARGARI, Appellee.No. 13-17-00049-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi, Edinburg.Delivered and filed June 14, 2018.Joseph O. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:08 am by Chris Castle
In pre-answer pleadings, Spotify has filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue and has asked the Court to transfer the case to the Southern District of New York failing dismissal. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:35 am by SHG
  The grand jury isn’t the venue to present “all the evidence. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nevertheless, the substantive elements of each cause of action are governed by state law. although the jurisdiction of the federal district court under 1338 is not challenged. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:16 am by Beth Graham
– Houston [1st], March 19, 2010), DynCorp International, LLC and Aramco entered into a contract for a computer system which was to be manufactured in the U.S. and installed at Aramco’s offices in Saudi Arabia. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:50 am by SHG
Copyright © 2013 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Richard Hunt
However, when the suit was refiled in the correct venue the plaintiff alleged there were still violations. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
The district court didn't buy that. [read post]