Search for: "DOES 1-121"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm
CSC Holdings, Inc., 536 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2008) (“Cablevision”), which found that a cable company’s remote-storage DVR system did not run afoul of the public performance right because each transmission was sent only to an individual user. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:40 pm
While he doesn't have formal legal training (but does hold two earned doctorates), Dr. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 3:00 am
Tennessee law recognizes several distinct types of spousal support, including (1) alimony in futuro, (2) alimony in solido, (3) rehabilitative alimony, and (4) transitional alimony. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:47 am
Rizzo, 121 F.3d 794, 801 & n.11 (1st Cir. 1997). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
S. 100, 121 (1941) ). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am
The only relief she granted Poole was on his claim for an accounting, which the court found was authorized by NYLPA § 99(1)(b). [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
At that stage the counsel usually does not yet have all the relevant details at his disposal. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am
” (New York Univ. v Farkas, 121 Misc 2d 643, 646 [Civ Ct, NY County 1983].) [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:05 pm
(Kullar, supra, 168 Cal.App.4th at pp. 121-122.) [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.); Pedersen v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:37 am
The parties spent three days arguing the following legal issues: Does the court have jurisdiction to award damages under s. 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms where the enactment of a statute is subsequently found to be unconstitutional? [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
[1] See Law360, June 15, 2012 (http://www.law360.com/articles/350730/print? [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal this week, but that does not mean the end to this legal challenge. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 1:08 pm
Does he really want to pick another fight on, say, compulsory commonhold for new developments? [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
[1] The article acknowledges that Ms. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:36 am
§ 203(e)(1). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm
Rands, 389 U.S. 121, 123 (1967). [5] Sturgeon v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:26 pm
Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318, 121 S. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:50 am
Super. 1, 9 (App. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:50 am
., No. 2024-121 (Fed. [read post]
