Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 741 - 760 of 29,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2010, 5:21 am
Sells, 463 F.3d 1148, 1154-55 (10th Cir. 2006); see also id. at n.1 (all federal circuits follow the doctrine of severability, though courts refer to it by different terms -- severability, severance, redaction, or partial suppression) (citing In re Search Warrant Dated July 4, 1977, 667 F.2d 117, 133 (D.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 428 F.2d 812 (6th Cir. 1970)). [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:42 am by The Docket Navigator
"[I]f [defendant's expert] attempts to incorporate the royalty rates underlying the [third party] licenses into his testimony in front of the jury, [defendant] must first establish the comparability of licenses. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 3:04 pm
Cincinnati Enquirer reporter Sharon Coolige writes today:A Hamilton County Municipal Court judge who swore at an angry defendant during sentencing issued a public apology Friday, saying it was wrong to tell the defendant "f--- you. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:33 pm by Ken Shigley
The proposed amendment to the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct on imputed disqualification, also known as Rule 1.10, states: “(d) A lawyer representing a client of a public defender office shall not be disqualified under this rule because of the representation by the office of another client in the same or a substantially related matter unless there is a conflict as determined by Rules 1.7, 1.8(f) or 1.9,” which determine conflicts of interest, according to… [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
But after Cozzi stopped, she was rear-ended at high speed by the defendant Ramirez, who was driving a Ford F-150 pickup truck. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Thomas, 372 F.3d 1173, 1175, 1178 (10th Cir. 2004) (warrantless entry permitted after defendant brandished a weapon). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm by Jamie Markham
The question is whether the defendant, who is now sentenced as a Class B1 through E felon due to the habitual felon law’s four-class enhancement, is subject to the elevated maximum sentence applicable to Class B1 through E sex offenders under G.S. 15A-1340.17(f). [read post]