Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 741 - 760 of 4,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 3:17 am by Robert Kraft
Comparing this to a total of 41 million Americans 65 and older, veterans and their single surviving spouses represent about 1/3 of the senior population. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
However, Boldack v East Lindsay DC 31 HLR 41 held that Cavalier v Pope was binding authority unless it could be distinguished.The Claimant sought to argue for a duty of care, relying on Lips v Older [2005] PIQR P14, where a (1/3) duty had been found in respect of a tenant who had fallen off a low retaining wall into a lowered area. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
However, Boldack v East Lindsay DC 31 HLR 41 held that Cavalier v Pope was binding authority unless it could be distinguished.The Claimant sought to argue for a duty of care, relying on Lips v Older [2005] PIQR P14, where a (1/3) duty had been found in respect of a tenant who had fallen off a low retaining wall into a lowered area. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:22 am by Jan von Hein
The CJEU, however, does not seem to worry too much about this aspect, which was not problematic in the case at hand (para. 41). [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 7:21 am by Bob Kraft
Department of Energy (DOE), as a rule of thumb, you can assume that every 5 mph you drive over 60 mph will cost you 7 percent more for gasoline. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Eleonora Rosati
Even if no sale or actual delivery of infringing goods actually occurred, the fact that the consumers were invited, by targeted advertising, to acquire ownership of the original or copy of the work in question, would suffice to trigger application of Article 4(1).What does this ruling mean? [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:10 am
" [Article 1(2)]The question that arises - and has actually arisen - is who is responsible for paying such royalty.The Resal Right Directive - in my view and contrary to the reasons for harmonization within Recital 9 - fails to provide a uniform response, in that Article 1(4) therein does not really mandate a harmonized approach at the level of individual Member States. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 2:29 am by Marcel Pemsel
Could this alignment be considered ‘assembly’, taking into account that Art. 110(1) CDR does not require a strict interpretation (Acacia at para. 41)? [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:14 am by Dave Broadwin
  The fact that we are all bored with the discussion does not however address the merits of the claim. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:15 am by Jani Ihalainen
It does not preclude the granting of an injunction, non-compliance with which is punishable by a fine".In relation to questions 6,7 and 8 (seeking to clarify the possible exclusion of actions taken against intermediary service providers), the Advocate General sought to strike a balance per recital 41 of the Directive. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:17 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The Future Unfortunately, the future of immigration does not fare well under the Trump administration. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:38 am by Larry
As noted in the ICCS decision, UL does not agree to retroactive licenses. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:13 am by Dennis Crouch
Within 1 year, the PTO Director will provide a report to Congress on the results. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:56 am by Sander van Rijnswou
At the end, the board does concede though that in other situations this argument might work. [read post]