Search for: "Does 1-32" Results 741 - 760 of 5,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Daniel Richardson
§ 317(c)(1) (documents deemed confidential by statute) because 32 V.S.A. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:58 pm
In a judgment issued yesterday, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) dismissed Red Bull’s appeal against the EU General Court’s decision [here], which had upheld the EUIPO’s First Board of Appeal’s finding that the Red Bull’s colour combination marks would be invalid.BackgroundRed Bull successfully registered two EU trade marks, one in 2005 and another one in 2011, for the combination of blue and silver in Class 32 (energy drinks) of the Nice… [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:41 am by Steve Kalar
Proc. 32 ramifications in the district court, and the corresponding encroachment on the claims/argument distinction on appeal.How to Use: Despite the waiver holding discussed above, the Ninth does go on to hold in the alternative that this wobbler prior was not actuallya mido. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:58 am by Richard Hunt
Supp. 3d 1, 32 (N.D.N.Y. 2021), the District Court summarized earlier decisions to conclude that Title II might be violated when “police wrongly arrest someone with a disability because they misperceive the effects of that disability as criminal activity. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 3:00 am
As an aside, click here for a post at Patently-O about Section 32 and the new "claims and continuations" rule. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 6:29 pm by Jim Walker
" This sketchy article does not identify who, if anyone, stated that physical violence was involved or concluded that the death was a homicide. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:53 am by Daniel Cappetta
L. c. 211E, §3(e), does not “authorize[] a sentencing judge to depart from the mandatory minimum terms specified by statute for subsequent drug offenses,” where “the Legislature has not yet enacted into law sentencing guidelines recommended by the Massachusetts Sentencing Commission. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:53 am by Daniel Cappetta
L. c. 211E, §3(e), does not “authorize[] a sentencing judge to depart from the mandatory minimum terms specified by statute for subsequent drug offenses,” where “the Legislature has not yet enacted into law sentencing guidelines recommended by the Massachusetts Sentencing Commission. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 1:01 am by Sander van Rijnswou
  The board does not share the views of the Examining division, and concludes that the claim has sufficient technical elements that improve the security of the hardcopy certificate. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 1:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
”), and, thus, we decline todisturb these credibility determinations hereOf waiver:Elbit conceded that it failed to argue that substantialevidence does not support the PTAB’s decision to creditThales’s explanation of the nonobviousness of the twostepmethod, see Oral Arg. at 27:30–32 (acknowledgingthat they “did not make . . . a legal argument” that thePTAB’s decision is unsupported by substantial evidence),which constitutes waiver, see Nan… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 10:19 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
The 67-32 vote included Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and 16 other Republicans in favor of moving forward. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Aug. 1, 2014)Willowood was sued for trademark infringement and related causes of action by a former licensor, and sought insurance coverage. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:00 am by Mark Astarita
However, keep in mind that the SEC does not concern itself with the losses. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:50 pm
One could therefore understand why Trump might not approve of this use of the word he (inadvertently) coined simultaneously to (1) promote the sale of alcohol (a product that he does not care for) and (2) mock him (an activity which he positively despises).However, under what ground could he oppose its registration? [read post]