Search for: "ELLIS v. STATE" Results 741 - 760 of 906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am by Jay Willis
Ellis speculates that the Court may summarily reverse the decision below on the ground that the Fifth Circuit should have used a more lenient standard of review in examining the state court’s ruling. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:03 pm by MacIsaac
This was recognized in Ellis in the quotation reproduced above. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
One "Ellie Light" has been writing "letters to the editor" in support of President Obama. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: UK: OiNK admin Alan Ellis found not guilty! [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:22 pm by David Leibowitz
When he arrived at Ellis Island, they changed his name to Leibowitz – to make it more “American” sounding. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
Monday in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]