Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 741 - 760
of 5,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2007, 4:57 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 9:37 am
” The 9th Circuit ignored the California state court rulings completely. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 10:58 am
Case citation: MidlevelU Inc v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
Hardy gave sworn testimony in which he stated that he "felt like the jury was on one big party." [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:20 pm
See Robert v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 8:33 pm
But the trial court felt itself constrained by the Sixth Circuit’s mandate, and imposed the 15-year mandatory minimum.fWhich brings us to Round Four – Peterson's second appeal, which prompted today's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
Olson and Boies, who worked as opposing counsel in Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
As the story describes the decision in Grant v. [read post]
statutory ban on nonfunctional slack fill doesn't show misleadingness/materiality as a matter of law
13 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Clevenger v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:42 am
There were no faithless elector this time and, on the heels of Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:08 am
State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:51 pm
Both cases, Moore v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:54 am
When the Mother got back up, she had a cut on her head because she “felt the blood. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:37 am
The State’s Attorney argues that a “willing speaker” must exist to implicate the First Amendment’s right to free speech, Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Knellinger v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
” Petrosino v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 7:36 am
The district court dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim because Mauro had failed to allege facts giving rise to a plausible inference of discrimination. [read post]
