Search for: "GRAY v. GRAY"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
The US Supreme Court will decide in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm
People v Nimmons, 95 AD3d 1360, 1360-1361, lv denied 19 NY3d 1028; People v Tucker, 91 AD3d 1030, 1031-1032, lv denied 19 NY3d 1002; People v Ham, 67 AD3d 1038, 1039-1040; People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771, 773, lv denied 7 NY3d 848).Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:21 am
DENNIS CROUCH (University of Missouri Law), and SCOTT MCKEOWN (Ropes & Gray) will also discuss this month’s decision BASF v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:03 am
The Court carefully considered the guidance from Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270, setting out how to assess this concept. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:18 am
The Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decided last week to reverse and remand the Houston district court's decision to throw out the case Fisher v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Supreme Court decided Gray v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
In the XJA case, in contrast to the recent decisions in JIH v News Group, Donald v Ntuli and Gray v UVW , the anonymity provisions were extended even though the case did not involve blackmail. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 1:34 am
[bit.ly] IP Think Tank Blog looks at i4i v Microsoft[ff.im] AAR on UWA v Gray – Universities and their employees: who owns developed IP? [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 5:01 am
[precedential]Stoller v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 2:17 pm
Gray, 28 M.J. 858 (A.C.M.R. 1989), then in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:38 am
Supreme Court decision in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Ringgold v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:01 pm
Riccardi (2012) 54 Cal.4th 758, 783, citing Gray v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:01 pm
Riccardi (2012) 54 Cal.4th 758, 783, citing Gray v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
App. 3d 944, 954-55; Gray v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that a probationary employee may be terminated at any time after the completing his or her minimum period of probation prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation [see Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904] unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14]. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 1:06 pm
Protection or indifference: Why the Arizona v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:52 pm
Rounds v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:01 am
Recently, a defendant in a false marking case pending before the Western District of Pennsylvania (FLFMC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
Gamboa objected, and argued that the exclusion of the qualified juror was immune to a harmless error analysis under Gray v. [read post]
