Search for: "George, P. v. George, A." Results 741 - 760 of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  One such example is the third edition’s treatment of confidence intervals.[1] The “DNA Identification” chapter noted that the meaning of a confidence interval is subtle,[2] but I doubt that the authors, David Kaye and George Sensabaugh, actually found it subtle or difficult. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
In Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul), the Supreme Court heard its second arbitration case, after Dallah Real Estate v Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46, [2011] 1 All ER 485 reported previously in these pages (see NLJ, 21 January 2011, p 104). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm by Sandy Levinson
  This is the true meaning of American exceptionalism" (p. 149). [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Nutting and Secretary of State George P. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Nutting and Secretary of State George P. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
In the three months since Russia began its war of aggression, the character of the country has been changing before our eyes. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:07 am by Douglas
Mas as centenas de familiares das vítimas do 11 de setembro de 2001, reunidas em uma cerimônia histórica no Marco Zero, onde ficavam a Torres Gêmeas, aplaudiram enfaticamente o ex-presidente George W. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:07 am by Douglas
Mas as centenas de familiares das vítimas do 11 de setembro de 2001, reunidas em uma cerimônia histórica no Marco Zero, onde ficavam a Torres Gêmeas, aplaudiram enfaticamente o ex-presidente George W. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]