Search for: "Grant v. USA"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,910
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2013, 4:15 am
Yet, as made clear last week, the heightened standard necessary to institute an Inter Partes Review at the USPTO’s Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB), coupled with the recent outcome in Fresenius USA v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
" Following the grant of cert. in Skilling v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:51 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 2012 WL 1681762 (S.D. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:54 am
MaerskContractors USA, Inc., 617 F.3d 1296, 1305 (Fed. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Today’s clippings focus on the ripple effects of the Court’s decision to grant cert. in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 7:51 pm
The case cite is Homax Products, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:03 pm
” Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
After its Conference last Friday, the Court announced two new cert. grants, both of which Lyle covered for this blog. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 2:25 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:25 pm
JBS USA, LLC, No. 8:10-CV-318 (D. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am
Penguin Books USA, Inc., 109 F.3d 1394 (9th Cir. 1997), or the “alternative means” test found in International Olympic Committee v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Joaquin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
They are: Astra USA Inc., et al., v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Yesterday the Court issued two opinions in argued cases and granted cert. in two new cases. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
¶¶ 38-39 (Teva v. [read post]
