Search for: "Hobbie v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm
United States, 62 Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 6:17 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:48 am
Casey, the Supreme Court famously replaced Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:39 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
However, in most states, either the state constitution or a state statute similar to the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) that was at issue in last year’s Hobby Lobby case provides for religious exceptions to any state or local law that substantially burdens religious exercise. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am
Barson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 12:40 pm
In yesterday’s EEOC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:16 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 am
From recreation of famous paintings using household materials to baking sourdough breads with home-made starters: the lockdown has prompted many of us to explore new hobbies. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
Conference v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
Article II, § 2 identifies the President as the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’ and the Supreme Court has stated unequivocally that the President has the prerogative to establish rules and regulations for the armed forces. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:30 am
Voice: Oh man, you gotta find a new hobby, Mission Creep. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
(The first was in Hobby Lobby.) [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm
See Burwell v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
State Farm. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
First, the government confirms in detail, at pages 3-6 of its reply brief, what I surmised last week: Both of the conditions would undermine the government's furtherance of its compelling interests, principally because there would be state-law obstacles to the creation of contraception-only insurance policies, and because the "opt in" requirement would impose burdens on women that their male counterparts do not share and that would, as a practical matter, decrease the… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
Read as actually contained in two opinions in Burwell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
This example also echoed another case pending before the Court this term: Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 8:11 am
Fulton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
In the 2014 case Burwell v. [read post]
