Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 741 - 760
of 7,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
From the majority opinion, by Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, in Cargill v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
South Carolina is a close ruling. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Instead, the comparator is unrelated non-disabled residents of a boarding house or similar business. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
Saifullah had drawn the attention of counterterrorism officials for his contacts with individuals considered close to al-Qaeda and its leadership. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 12:34 am
Jones in 2012 and Florida v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm
Such is the teaching of the First District Court of Appeal’s December 28, 2022 published opinion in Charles Jenkins et al v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Palastra, 729 F.2d 353, 355 (5th Cir. 1984) (“Our jurisdiction can, in the interest of judicial economy, extend as a matter of discretion to review of the closely related denial of qualified immunity. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
The magistrate judge eventually closed out the case and approved the proposed settlement under the term sheet (and not the language in the drafts that went back and forth), as per the Second Circuit's procedures in Cheeks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
A founding mantra of the in-house revolution is “we hire the lawyer, not the law firm. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
” The 1969 Supreme Court decision in Powell v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Traditionally each of the major houses provided their own annual divination. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:05 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:08 pm
In 2007, Texas lawmakers passed House Bill 8, which is known as the Jessica Lunsford Act, in tribute to a 9-year-old Florida girl who was kidnapped, raped, and murdered by a convicted sex offender. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
As December draws to a close, we’ve reached the requisite moment to reflect on what happened in 2022. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 3:50 am
Periods of tightening include the 1980s when the House of Lords developed the notion of “procedural exclusivity” in O’Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237, which required public law challenges ordinarily to be pursued via judicial review proceedings. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
What it was attempting to do was to make the point that the Supreme Court had never come close to offering a cogent analysis of what it actually meant by “one person/one vote” and therefore the mantra of “equality” in voting power, which, after all, was the basis of Reynolds v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 1:16 pm
The White House said that courts might block it. [read post]
