Search for: "I D B Board"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2021, 1:59 pm
I also noted that cybersecurity-related issues represent an ongoing D&O claims risk. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:21 am
§§ 1208.16(d)(2) and 1240.8(d). [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:21 am
§§ 1208.16(d)(2) and 1240.8(d). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 11:57 am
The final FAA Act, however, did not include rescission language, but rather amended the RLA by: (a) specifying that the NMB must provide an opportunity for public hearing regarding any significant rules; (b) requiring that in any runoff election for which there are three or more options (including the option of “no union”) on the ballot and none receives a majority of the valid votes cast, a second election would be held between the two options receiving the most votes; (c)… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:50 pm
The Act would also prohibit the Board from requiring that audits be conducted by specific auditors. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:26 am
In support of its position it contended that in 1997 it suggested to a CSEA Labor Relations specialist that the topic should be discussed during the next round of collective bargaining by the parties.Based on this record, Mayo ruled that “[b]ecause of the equivocal nature of the evidence contained within the stipulation of facts, I cannot find that a past practice ever existed within the Town regarding retiree health insurance. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
b. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
The Board shall nominate for election as directors only incumbent candidates who have tendered, prior to the mailing of the proxy statement for the annual meeting at which they are to be re-elected as directors, irrevocable resignations authorized by Section 141(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law that will be effective upon (i) the failure to receive the required vote at any annual meeting at which they are nominated for re-election and (ii) Board… [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 7:48 pm
To get on this list, you'd need to add the corporate law key designation K22, which I, for one, never do. [read post]
23 May 2007, 7:48 am
[By the way, who'll want to serve on the Condominium's Board? [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 10:16 am
I mean, seriously, what kind of buffoons come up with this stuff? [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:19 pm
I often hear new fund advisers say that they intend to rely on a particular exemption from one law and assume this exemption applies across the board to all securities laws. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:16 pm
With so much news coming out of Hamburg this week I decided it was time to repost what I’d written about my visit to Neuengamme, a concentration camp not far from the city. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:36 pm
There, the missing claimlimitation—step D of steps A-D—was nothing more thanan instruction to repeat steps A, B, and C until a particularquantity of email was sent in accordance with theclaim. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In my last column, I discussed how the raison d’être of lawyer regulation is to ensure that anyone providing legal services will meet standards of professional competence and professional conduct. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:36 pm
No, skip it, I'd rather not calculate. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
Series A, B, C, and D only differed by the presence or absence of claim 7, respectively.[2.6] The Board is not persuaded by the arguments of the [patent proprietor].[2.6.1] The communication annexed to the summons summarised the issues to be discussed at the OPs resulting from the impugned decision, the SGA and the replies of the [opponents] to the SGA: in particular, objections under A 123(2) concerning the split of granted claim 1, objections as to a lack of novelty with… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:43 am
Virgin did not submit survey evidence of brand recognition and awareness, and Applicant Moore did not concede that the mark VIRGIN is famous.For the sake of completeness, the Board considered the six non-exhaustive factors of Section 43(c)(2)(B)(i)-(vi), in determining whether there existed a likelihood of confusion by blurring. [read post]
