Search for: "Illinois v. Michigan" Results 741 - 760 of 957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– John Fllesher, The Associated Press, April 23, 2010 A federal bankruptcy judge approved a deal with the government on Friday that requires Lyondell Chemical Co. to pay $103 million toward the cleanup of a polluted 80-mile section of the Kalamazoo River in southwest Michigan. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
  The Court also refused to hear a suit by Michigan against Illinois involving attempts to stop the invasive migration of Asian carp into Lake Michigan. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:32 pm by Ilya Somin
During that time, numerous state supreme courts have invalidated Keo-like “economic development” takings under their state constitutions — including Illinois, Michigan, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, and South Carolina (see this article for cites to these cases). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Justice Stevens wrote for a unanimous Court in Illinois Tools Works v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:58 am
Department of Justice and the States of Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin against Dean Foods Company for violating Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:46 am by Betsy McKenzie
(Administrators at two of those partners, Michigan and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, confirmed that Google had solicited them.) [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:37 am by Erin Miller
Concurring Opinions also posts on a new essay from the Virginia Law Review about Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
  We had also had concerns about the lack of public process and compliance with the Michigan Freedom of Information Act and Open Meetings Act. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
Michigan had filed a renewed motion, citing new DNA evidence of Asian carp slipping into Lake Michigan and a study that allegedly contradicted Illinois' fears of major economic losses. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
The consent decree settled charges brought by the States of Illinois, Michigan, and New York that the manufacturer violated federal and state antitrust laws by entering into agreements with dealers to fix the prices at which its furniture was offered to consumers. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by msW1Ld
  California now joins Illinois, New York and Michigan (see March 31, 2008 Post) in treating resale price maintenance as a per se offense in violation of its state antitrust law even though such conduct is subject to rule of reason review under section 1 of the Sherman Act after Leegin Creative Lether Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
The court also entered judgment in the same amount for AISLIC on its indemnity claim against Crump Insurance Services of Illinois, Inc. [read post]