Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 741 - 760 of 7,655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2009, 11:15 pm
In re General Technologies, Inc., Serial Nos. 77052472 and 77052485 (July 23, 2009) [not precedential].Of course, the Supreme Court has told us that a single color cannot be an inherently distinctive mark. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:36 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Word Mark 6835527 BUYIMMI 6827817 I’M NOT YOUR KITE BITCH 6827793 GATORADE, G, GIT 6827776 SOULFUL KITCHEN 6827602 GATORADE THIRST QUENCHER 6827518 GATORADE G FIT 6827503 BOLT24 6827460 6821071 ROGUE 6821026 MIDNIGHT FIRE 6821025 CHANTILLY CREAM 6816557 PREMIER PARTNERS 6815166 EBB TIDE 6815165 UPTOWN GIRL 6815024 COBAS X 6816543 MONEYGUARD FIXED ADVANTAGE 6815019 LT 6810691 ONE RING RESPONSE 6833625 ANYTHING GOES AGAIN 6835474 M 6832928 … [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:00 am
" Link: The TTABlog ®Link: In re Chippendales USA, Inc., No. 78666598 (Mar. 25, 2009). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:57 am by Emma Durand-Wood
law.arts.culture (Osgoode Hall) Canadian Tax Dispute Blog (Pushor Mitchell LLP) Simpson Thomas Blog Litigation Brief (Hakemi & Company Law Corporation) Couture et associés avocats Canadian M&A Perspectives (McCarthy Tetrault) The Buchanan Ontario Workplace Law Blog Canadian Appeals Monitor (McCarthy Tetrault) Oatley, Vigmond Personal Injury Lawyers Blog Public Law Advocacy (Gordon Scott Campbell) PrivacySense (Mark Goldstein) Devry Smith Frank Blog As always, if… [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
See if you can read my mind about why I put "mind-reading" and "facts" in quotation marks. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am by Jon Hyman
While this milestone is mind-blowing (at least to me), I am marking this bi-millenium with news of a different kind. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:09 pm by Jenna Greene
They're asking for every shred of paper, every piece of electronic data ever generated. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 2:14 pm
"The case was remanded to the TTAB for further proceedings.TTABlog comment: I'm still thinking about this decision. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:49 am by Ed Greenlee
 Why not enjoy the summer outdoors with Losing Twice:  Harms of Indifference in the Supreme Court, by Emily M. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am by Ron Coleman
 Its principal testified: “[m]y main objection was that basically this was a large corporation coming at me and saying, telling us what to do, and, oh, by the way you’re going to pay for it, too…. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
As I told Lexis last year, we don't want to feel like we're buying a used car from a sleazy salesman in a polyester suit. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
Panel 2: Patents and ScienceChristopher M. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 11:48 pm by Jeff Nowak
The Facts Mark worked in the parts department for Utility Trailers, and during one of his shifts in late March 2010, he fell off a ladder, re-aggravating a preexisting back injury. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:03 am
 At least if we’re keeping this in that mythical cocktail party context where I’m being asked The Question. [read post]