Search for: "In re: Warren"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
Interested in the use of courts as an instrument for social justice -- historically a mainly false hope, but one that was fostered by actions of the Warren Court from 1954-1968 that were contrary to the tide of both prior and subsequent Supreme Court history -- I read Miller's piece to see what it said. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
On MSNBC, Norah O'Donnell interviewed Warren Richey, who today reported in the Christian Science Monitor on the oral argument in the Second Circuit in the Ricci case. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
The motivation for this legislation is Warren Buffett's claim that he pays a higher effective tax rate than his secretary - a claim that, as I've pointed out, is dubious, at least with regard to the specific numbers he gives. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:14 am
Warren Lewis was in no mood to cooperate. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 8:19 pm
The Warren Court of 1961 was composed of a bunch of nineteenth century gentlemen. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:23 am
Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) are cosponsors of the bill. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
Source: erhui1979 / DigitalVision Vectors / Getty In a June 5 letter to Senators Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and Kirsten Gillibrand, NLRB Chairman John F. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 4:58 am
going after Elizabeth Warren’s precious baby, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:50 pm
Poison pills and other anti-takeover defenses should be put to a shareholder vote and re-evaluated by the board on a periodic basis. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
Source: erhui1979 / DigitalVision Vectors / Getty In a June 5 letter to Senators Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and Kirsten Gillibrand, NLRB Chairman John F. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:06 pm
However, as Elizabeth Warren is discovering, when you actually spell out a plan for Medicare for All, you start taking heavy fire fast. [read post]
11 May 2014, 1:11 pm
In a sense, we’re all equal because now we’re all fumbling around in a second language for a change. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 5:58 am
Take a look even if you're not a tax expert. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 5:43 am
And they’re not big spenders. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:51 pm
Let’s start off by stating that we’re not going to prove whether or not Utah’s bigamy law is unconstitutional in this blog. [read post]
13 May 2022, 6:36 am
The recent opinion by the Appellate Division, Third Department, in In re Strom Irrevocable Trust III, 2022 NY Slip Op 01356, provides a cautionary tale to estate litigators who conduct SCPA 1404 examinations in the face of a trust instrument’s in terrorem clause. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:58 am
We're open to suggestions. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
That could be more anti-truth than standing back and announcing that we're not checking anything so smarten up Facebookers, because you're on your own. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
Then again, when executives and directors own a sizable stake in the company — think Warren Buffett or Steve Jobs — that kind of work is its own reward. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 6:02 pm
But guess what we're not so good at? [read post]