Search for: "In re Williams"
Results 741 - 760
of 11,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 10:47 am
Steven Eugene Cauley, former partner in Little Rock, Arkansas, law firm Cauley Bowman Carney & Williams LLC, pled guilty to charges of stealing more than $9 million of client's money from the case "in re BISYS Securities Litigation 04-3840 in U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
We have crazy people roaming the streets without any option for treatment, the schools are past falling apart, bridges are falling down, and yet we're spending hundreds of millions building shiny plastic streetcars and condos for Homer Williams, Gerding-Edlen, Hank Ashforth, and the rest of the real estate set. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:12 am
But the next time they're in the same room, best not bring up the 'fed-a-pult' guy. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:25 am
The Sixth Circuit addressed on Monday a circuit split concerning appellate jurisdiction over bankruptcy court orders rejecting planned confirmation in In re William Lindsey. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:03 pm
By Jeanna Smialek and Patricia Laya, Photographs by William Mebane. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
In re Williams, Serial No. 77100894 (December 30, 2008) [not precedential].Applicant's goods are used in offshore shipboard drilling operations, using flywheels to store energy. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 3:35 am
Here’s news from Steven Haas of Hunton & Williams: The Court of Chancery recently granted an attorneys’ fee award of $8.25 million resulting from the settlement in In re Gardner Denver, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:33 pm
Their quarterfinal round ended up being a re-match of one of their preliminaries rounds, against a competitive team. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
They're all his clients. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:40 am
Mary Holper (Roger Williams University) has posted The New Moral Turpitude Test: Failing Chevron Step Zero (Brooklyn Law Review , Vol. 76, No. 4, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
28 May 2007, 11:26 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 605 F.2d 1155, 1159 (10th Cir.1979) (same); Williams v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
And if you’re still not persuaded, remember, Jefferson has promised an “honorable explanation” for the money in the freezer. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:31 am
We're going to managed that process for them to make it as seamless as possible," Cole said. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:58 pm
[Gawker] * This is what it's like when you're at jury duty and a lawyer. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 4:29 am
He was reading the teleprompter, so that's where his eyes were locked.Meanwhile, Aidy Bryant does William Barr, but Barr isn't a person we know well enough to know whether this is a funny impersonation. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 1:27 am
(You have to create an account to vote).You can vote here: http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/vote/41760Also, would super awesome if could retweet it:https://twitter.com/amyywan/status/499781035450957824Also, since you're already there, it'd also be awesome if you could support Rebecca William's panel on Government Data:'Your Laws, Your Data: Making Government More… [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Ashley Moran We’re pleased to share compelling set of essays from our recent LevinsonFest 2022 panel entitled Can this Constitution Be Saved? [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:17 am
Contents include:Dominik Zaum, International Organisations, Legitimacy, and Legitimation Mervyn Frost, Legitimacy and International Organisation: The Changing Ethical Context Paul Williams, Regional and Global Legitimacy Dynamics: The United Nations and Regional Arrangements Jennifer Welsh & Dominik Zaum, Legitimation and the UN Security Council Alhaji Sarjoh Bah, ECOWAS and the Legitimacy Question: A Normative and Institutional Approach Walter Lotze, The African Union Alice Ba, The… [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:58 pm
The other day, I linked to David Williams insightful post countering the conventional EpiPen narrative. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:17 pm
The Court explained:Mindful of the “extraordinary nature” of mandamus relief, In re Williams-Sonoma, Inc., 947 F.3d 535, 538 (9th Cir. 2020), we conclude that it is warranted here as the [petitioners] present a novel issue involving the interplay of two Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that has divided district courts across the country and that is likely to have significant continued relevance in the wake of technological advancements and professional norms changing… [read post]
