Search for: "Insulator Co."
Results 741 - 760
of 1,385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am
The company fired Dunn because a co-worker complained about inappropriate race-based comments. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am
The company fired Dunn because a co-worker complained about inappropriate race-based comments. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
In today's chapter, American Express Co., et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 11:05 am
In Mersino Management Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:10 am
” Significantly, the Appellate Division pointed out that Warner and his co-plaintiffs, as retirees are not involved in subsequent collective bargaining negotiations and that "it is logical to assume [from the absence of any such durational language] that the bargaining unit intended to insulate retirees from losing important insurance rights during subsequent negotiations by using language in each and every contract which fixed their rights to coverage as of the time… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
Thorpe Insulation Co., Superior Ct Calif., Los Angeles Cty. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 12:04 pm
Under Title VII, an employer can be held responsible for the discriminatory actions of its employees; it is easier for a victim to hold the employer accountable if the harasser is a "supervisor" than if the harassment comes from someone who is just a co-worker. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:37 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:42 pm
On June 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm
Posted by John LewisThis blog post was co-authored by: Dustin Dow The U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
So if the arbitration clause is enforceable, Amex has insulated itself from antitrust liability—even if it has in fact violated the law. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:43 pm
Express Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:54 pm
In a 5-3 decision the Court (per Justice Scalia) held that it is perfectly acceptable for companies to use arbitration clauses to insulate themselves from federal claims that might be brought by potential adversaries. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:03 pm
Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
Tea Co., 46 N.Y.2d 62, 69, quoting 5 Williston, Contracts § 1293, at 3682 [rev ed 1937]). [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
These two roles cannot co-exist. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:10 am
This will insulate your personal assets from any exposure to liability that arises from the podcast. 7. [read post]
