Search for: "JOHN BARRETT"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2021, 9:07 pm
” Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, each wrote separate dissenting opinions. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:05 am
They were later joined by two individuals (Neill Hurley and John Nantz). [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 10:32 am
I assume Barrett would agree as well, as might the Chief Justice John Roberts (who voted against the stay) if he reached the merits. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:43 pm
As did Barrett. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
” As Justice Amy Coney Barrett put it, “the 5th Circuit approach says that there’s basically no one [to consider those objections], because it falls through the cracks, so no one decides. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm
Barrett is expected to take the judicial oath, which will allow her to begin work, on Tuesday. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, did not list any reimbursable travel or gifts, and he did not hold any outside positions. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
Barrett’s appointment to the Supreme Court should not determine the ACA’s fate – at least not in this case – because this should not be a close call. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 8:07 am
United States, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority decision said that a former president has criminal immunity for some official actions taken while in office. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
” (Page 2 of Justice Barrett’s concurring opinion.) [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:11 pm
For instance, we see no substantive distinction between the article's description of [John] Wintermute as "a violent, raging drunk" in the original article, and as "a 'dangerous and violent alcoholic'" in the modified article. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 8:26 am
Rohini Kurup shared an Oct. 21 press conference led by Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe and FBI Director Christopher Wray on foreign election interference by Iran and Russia. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:55 am
Justices Roberts, Barrett, and Kavanaugh likely feared the political fallout from the opinion (all three worked for President Bush during the Bush v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
In any event, the Court does recognize that there is a case where a state (a Southern one) did actually disqualify someone under Section 3:In 1868, the Governor of Georgia refused to commission John Christy, who had won the most votes in a congressional election, because—in the Governor’s view—Section 3 made Christy ineligible to serve. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:33 pm
This was the first case argued before the court since Justice Amy Coney Barrett took the bench. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Guarnieri immediately encountered skepticism from Chief Justice John Roberts, who suggested that the government’s reliance on legislative history might once have had more weight with the court than it’s likely to have now. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
But Gorsuch and Barrett did not tip their hands as clearly as Kavanaugh on Wednesday. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:46 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts was the first to raise this issue, telling Waggoner that as a practical matter the only relief she and her clients were seeking was a “declaration that you are right,” with the nominal damages – a dollar — standing in as a symbol of that vindication. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, seemed to suggest that because someone who is homeless can instantly become “not homeless,” homelessness is not a status. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am
Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Breyer seemed more concerned with the consequences if the department prevailed. [read post]
