Search for: "Julie Morris"
Results 741 - 760
of 999
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 9:09 am
If we include the "Responses to Non-Final Office Actions" in the list of applications amended, the numbers change dramatically, as Table 4 illustrates.LBE did write in a post titled Patent Grant Rate Lower Than Many Academics Think about a different paper by Lemley and Sampat:However, in July 2007, Lemley and Sampat placed on SSRN a paper entitled "Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp? [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:56 pm
NOTE: My legal and mediation services are offered to clients in Union, Middlesex, Somerset, Essex, Hudson, Bergen, and Morris counties in NJ. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:57 am
., July 6, 2010 [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:42 am
., A-4572-08T3, July 13, 2010: Rule 5:8-6, which governs the trial of custody issues, provides that “the court may on its own motion or at the request of a litigant conduct an in camera interview with the child(ren). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:39 am
., A-4572-08T3, July 13, 2010: Although the court has the discretion to exercise “the extreme remedy of enjoining or conditioning a litigant’s ability to present his or her claim to the court[,] [that remedy] must be used sparingly; it is not a remedy of first or even second resort. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:35 am
., A-5381-08T3, July 13, 2010: Once the moving party has established “a prima facie showing of changed circumstances warranting relief[,] . . . the court [has] the right to order full discovery regarding the financial circumstances of the other spouse. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:20 am
Div. 2010), A-5702-07, July 12, 2010: The old rule, upheld most recently in Yanhko v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:13 am
., A-3080-08T3, July 12, 2010: The Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 to -33 (the Act) permits a victim to “file a complaint alleging the commission of an act of domestic violence with the Family Part. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:05 am
Div. 2010), A-5702-07, July 12, 2010: When the grant of summary judgment is under review, the Appellate Divison must apply the same standard as the trial court to the same motion record. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 4:06 pm
More details surface in nursing home case, Chicago Tribune, July 9, 2010 Chicago, Illinois Nursing Home Negligence? [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:00 pm
Vanden Heuvel, Morris Pearl, Vin Roberti, Dennis Mehiel, Elaine Sargent, Matthew Lifflander, Jay Kaplowitz, and Hon. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
Div. 2010), A-2189-08, July 8, 2010: Rule 5:5-4 states, [I]n exercising its discretion as to the mode and scheduling of disposition of motions, the court shall ordinarily grant requests for oral argument on substantive and non-routine discovery motions and ordinarily deny requests for oral argument on calendar and routine discovery motions. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Div. 2010), A-2189-08, July 8, 2010: A motion to terminate alimony based upon changed circumstances or a motion for increases in alimony and child support are subject to the mandatory requirements set forth in Rule 5:5-4(a): When a motion or cross-motion is brought for the entry or modification of an order or judgment for alimony or child support based on changed circumstances, the pleading filed in support of the motion shall have appended to it a copy of the prior case information… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:11 am
Div. 2010), A-2189-08, July 8, 2010: Reconsideration is “a matter within the sound discretion of the Court, to be exercised in the interest of justice[,]” D’Atria v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:53 am
Div. 2010), A-2189-08, July 8, 2010: Not every Lepis application requires a plenary hearing. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
Div. 2010), A-0949-09, July 8, 2010: The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), N.J.S.A. 2A:34-53 to -95, was adopted by New Jersey in 2004, see Table of Jurisdictions Wherein Act Has Been Adopted (preceding N.J.S.A. 2A:34-53), to replace the former Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), N.J.S.A. 2A:34-28 to -52 (repealed). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
., A-0919-09T2 / A-1087-09T2, July 7, 2010: The expansive authority of a personal representative over the estate’s property cannot be doubted. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
., A-0919-09T2 / A-1087-09T2, July 7, 2010: Any objection to a commission from the beneficiary would require an examination of the sufficiency of the work performed and the worth of “the actual pains, trouble and risk” undertaken by that claimant as an administrator. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
., A-0919-09T2 / A-1087-09T2, July 7, 2010: Fees ostensibly incurred on behalf of the estate are subject to reduction or rejection based upon whether those fees have benefited the estate, see, e.g., In re Bloomer, 37 N.J. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:49 am
., A-0919-09T2 / A-1087-09T2, July 7, 2010: A jural act may at times be a judge’s oral pronouncement of judgment and not necessarily a later memorializing order, see Community Realty Mgmt., Inc. v. [read post]
