Search for: "LUNG v. STATE" Results 741 - 760 of 1,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
  In 1990, the United States Attorney’s office, for the Eastern District of Philadelphia, filed a civil RICO against several Philadelphia-area physicians for their role in submitting false and fraudulent Medicare claims.[9]  As pleaded by the government, the fraudulent scheme consisted of soliciting industrial workers for “free” lung screening, at the behest of lawyer clients, for asbestos-related diseases. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:02 pm by Brian M. Wright
The Washington State Supreme Court has rejected the “increased risk” test (elsewhere referred to as the “positional risk” doctrine) in several cases, most recently in Street v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
”[9] The Reporter’s example of PCBs and small lung cancer was an obvious reference to the Joiner case, in which the Supreme Court held that the trial judge had properly excluded causation opinions. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
  Selikoff’s medical practice in Paterson, New Jersey, afforded him the opportunity to observe “the incidence of lung disease among workers at the Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO),”24 which operated one of its factories in Paterson. 1951. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm by Susan Brenner
The state or federal magistrate who is being asked to issue the search wa [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:08 am by Jeff Gamso
  Here's Justice Stevens from his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]