Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 741 - 760 of 13,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Constantin then appealed the decision, which ultimately ended up with the CJEU.The Court began by limiting the scope of the issue, following the guidance of the Advocate General, to only consider whether the mark was contrary to accepted principles of morality, as the matter didn't relate to any issues of public policy.To consider the above, the Court noted that, to determine the scope of Article 7(1)(f) "...it is not sufficient for the sign concerned to be… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
These types of fasteners comprise: “riveting elements” and “pressform elements” as defined in Exhibit 5 which is a datasheet of the “DVS-Deutscher Verband für Schweißen und verwandte Verfahren”.This document defines a “riveting element” as an element with a portion which is deformed after having been inserted into the object with which it has to be connected by form fit (“Einnietbare Funktionselemente sind gekennzeichnet durch… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 7:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
“[T]he hallmark of written description is disclosure. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Michael Froomkin
Since I don’t know much about it, I asked an expert, my colleague (and Coral Gables resident) Osamudia James, to write an explanation for this blog. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm by Bexis
  It doesn’t matter that the plaintiff isn’t a party to the agreement, nor is it necessary for the arbitration to have actually happened as an “agreement” is enough under §205. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 11:19 am by Eugene Volokh
The European mark appears to have the vulgarities expurgated; I can't speak to whether, as a matter of European trademark law, that would also cover the unexpurgated version of the phrase. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
In short: because men go without saying, it matters when women literally can't be said at all. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 2:13 pm by Steven G. Pearl
LLC, 617 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussed here -- it's funny to look back at my old posts and see how bad they were!) [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:13 am by Rich
Co., 690 F.3d 176, 181 (4th Cir. 2012) ("We therefore agree with [the plaintiff] that her potential recovery in this case is not limited, as a matter of law, to a premium refund. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
., 47 AD2d 172, [3d Dept 1975], affd 41 NY2d 825, Commissioner Rosa noted that "[t]he superintendent’s reasons must be sufficiently specific so that the teacher can submit “a reasonable and logical reply” thereto. [read post]