Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law" Results 741 - 760 of 1,631
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 8:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Supreme Court has granted cert on the design patent damages question presented in Samsung v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:11 pm by Florian Mueller
There was no weekly conference last Friday, so this cert petition will be discussed this week, and we'll know the decision (unless there's another relisting) on Monday morning.Samsung received unusually broadbased support for its petition, which definitely buttressed the electronics giant's claims that the issues in the case--damages (disgorgement of unapportioned infringer's profits) and claim construction (functional elements not to be considered in infringement and… [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The next question before the Texas CCA was whether anything in federal law overrode the state law. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:37 am by Sean Wajert
Defendant Google has filed a powerful cert petition, asking the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am by SHG
As a practical matter, that’s a pretty important question. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by Ray Dowd
Supreme Court takes on a case, it is less interested in whether a particular court of appeals got the case right or wrong, than whether the courts of appeals are divided or inconsistent on important questions of law. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:02 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The important thing is to spend some time now considering what you should tell those most closely associated with you to facilitate their handling of your affairs upon your death, and then write those matters down as soon as possible. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  What mattered in questions of whether or not the U.S. securities laws applied was not where the alleged misconduct took place or where its effects occurred; the focus of the Exchange Act, Justice Scalia wrote, “is not upon the place where the deception originated but upon purchases and sales of securities in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Carr, 297 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 307 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1974), the court held that the hospital’s patient “may not be bound by the charges put in the contract as he is entitled to question the reasonableness thereof. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:34 am by Florian Mueller
Apple has just responded to Samsung's mid-December petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) regarding two legal questions concerning design patents and, in the same document, to amicus curiae ("friend of the court") briefs from major industry players, many IP law professors and various public interest advocates, all of whom agree with Samsung that the top U.S. court should take a look at this matter. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
, 296 Kan. 906, 296 P.3d 106, cert. denied 134 S.Ct. 162 (Kansas Supreme Court 2013).State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Cain, 14-10008 (seventh) asks questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel; Taylor v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
App. 212, 98 A.3d 81, cert. denied, 314 Conn. 932, 102 A.3d 83 (2014). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The Supreme Court’s own Rule 10 says that in deciding whether to grant cert, the Court considers whether a lower court has ruled on “an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The Supreme Court’s own Rule 10 says that in deciding whether to grant cert, the Court considers whether a lower court has ruled on “an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
The Supreme Court’s own Rule 10 says that in deciding whether to grant cert, the Court considers whether a lower court has ruled on “an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am by Florian Mueller
I doubt that anyone will file a brief in support of Apple's opposition to the cert petition next month. [read post]