Search for: "Matter of Goldstein"
Results 741 - 760
of 974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2011, 11:07 am
Corp. (13 NY3d 511 [2009]) and Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:50 am
that's what matters ... [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:42 am
National copyright rules on protectable subject matter, ownership, term, and rights are covered in detail and compared from country to country, as are topics on moral rights and neighboring rights. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents one set of respondents in the case.] [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
Goldstein is with the firm of Goldstein, Howe & Russell, which sponsors this blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
IMS Health (in which Goldstein, Howe and Russell represents one set of respondents). [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 12:46 pm
As a matter of fact, they’re expanding! [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
Goldstein of Goldstein, Howe & Russell in Washington, D.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:44 am
Goldstein (Saint Louis University - School of Law) has posted Leading the Court: Studies in Influence as Chief Justice (Stetson Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C., which sponsors this blog, filed an amicus brief in support of i4i, but the author of this post was not involved in the case.] [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Goldstein has a helpful post on the other holdings). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:54 pm
Goldstein, Philadelphia Tax Attorney Ask the taxgirl: Why Justice Matters (revisited) [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Steir, Chairman and CEO of Studley, Howard Nottingham, Executive Managing Director of Studley, and David Goldstein, Executive Vice President of Studley represented WilmerHale. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' reply Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in the following case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.Title: Florence v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Below, I have collected some of the case law and commentary on the issue of using relative and attributable risks to satisfy plaintiff’s burden of showing, more likely than not, that an exposure or condition caused his or her disease or injury. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
We have also been in contact with several of the other regional hedge fund industry groups regarding this matter, however, due to the lack of publicity regarding the proposal, the short notice period that NASAA has provided for the proposed rule, and the logistics of circulating this information to these other constituents, it is not possible for us to express the views of the other regional associations. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:07 pm
Paul Goldstein, Copyright's Highway 94-95 (rev. ed. 2003). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represent the petitioner.Title: Allshouse v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein calls the decision “a resounding affirmation of the right to engage peacefully in speech, even terribly hurtful speech, on matters of public import,” and the editorial boards of many major newspapers and most commentators seem to support the outcome. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:09 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
