Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 741 - 760
of 14,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2022, 1:27 pm
In both the GC found they did matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:59 am
Be he insisted that he didn’t consider what he did to be plagiarism. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
I have defended marks with very little, but defeated marks with more. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
We have a lot to catch up on, don't we? [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am
(If you don’t believe a federal officer may be impeached based on his or her conduct prior to taking office, please review the impeachments of Judge Robert W. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Here there was no evidence to suggest that the public would see the name as indicating the geographical origin of anything covered by SBM's marks, and the matter was not so clear as to justify inferring that such an association should be made. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:55 pm
” In addition, Dastarwarns that “[t]he words of the Lanham Act should not be stretched to cover matters that are typically of no consequence to purchasers. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:22 am
They were filed a day before the hearing in this matter. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
(f) trade marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of moralitySubsequently, also the EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal and the General Court (T‑69/17) upheld the initial EUIPO decision. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:55 pm
Informed user The Court recalled settled case law, according to which the concept of ‘informed user’ lies somewhere between the ‘average consumer’ in trade mark matters (who need not have any specific knowledge and makes no direct comparison between the trade marks) and the ‘sectoral expert’ (who is an expert with detailed technical expertise). [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Shahar Dilbary has a paper saying we should penalize mark owners for changing goods/services, but that didn’t happen. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:36 pm
As a matter of public policy, it's egregiously misconceived. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:12 am
"Moreover, "questions of procedural missteps are not matters for Board consideration, but rather should be taken up by way of petition to the Director. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:01 am
Polistas said it didn't, while MHCS said that there was no limitation on the duration of the licence or on the number of shirts it could make bearing Polistas's mark. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm
” Each new legal brief that adds to this call can, like a tweet marked #BlackLivesMatter, amplify the point that the lives of people confronted by the police really do matter, and that the obligation to value those lives does not fall only on the police. [read post]
25 May 2008, 12:34 pm
It's the Sunday of a three-day weekend, but that hasn't stopped the five authors below - and a handful of others - from staying immersed in the blogosphere. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:01 am
Yes, the collection agency might get a reputational bad mark, and perhaps doesn’t collect its fee, depending on the terms of the contract. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 3:30 am
It doesn’t matter what state you live in or whether you work for policyholders or insurance companies, safety is priority. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:10 am
That the description of the opposed sign said that the “mark features two triangular-shaped lines (…), which almost resemble the peaks of a mountain range” did not matter. [read post]
