Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 741 - 760 of 824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Mitch McConnell’s campaign Twitter account, Team Mitch, has been locked out. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am by Scott R. Anderson
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
This year, I publicly challenged Will Baude and Michael McConnell to a debate on Section 3! [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Not content with those spoils, Mitch McConnell and the GOP-controlled Senate have played hardball to gain still further advantage. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Margaret Taylor
The timing of when the Senate will act on Ratcliffe’s nomination is entirely up to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who could choose—or be persuaded by the president—to sit on the nomination. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) in the States, 68 Catholic University Law Review 629 (2020). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To state the obvious, no emergency exists. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  The Court won’t be settling that issue in the case of Horne v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
 Oh, important conservatives cracked now and then--Judge Bork waffled on Griswold and Professor McConnell wrote a stunningly honest attempt at an originalist justification of Brown v. [read post]