Search for: "Miller v. State of California"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 833, 851-852), the Court also acknowledged that “[t]he distinction between elements of a project and measures designed to mitigate impacts of the project may not always be clear” (quoting Lotus v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
” (Citing to its recent decision in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
” CBE’s argument that the federal regulatory purpose differs from California’s failed “because the federal and state goals are identical: to protect public health and welfare. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:01 am
Flanders v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:27 am
Additional Resources: Obama wants to help California create more retirement-savings accounts, July 13, 2015, LA Times More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm
Mar. 28, 2012); Miller v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
’” (Citing Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
” We will be watching for the Ninth Circuit’s decision and will report it to you. - Randy Miller and Sava Berhane [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
California, 332 U.S. 46, 71-72 (1947) (Black, J., dissenting) (finding the protections of the Bill of Rights to be applicable against the States through Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment). [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:36 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Finally: Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
State Lands Com. (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476, 496.) [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:23 pm
["[M]uch of [the Oregon State Bar statement's] criticism of then-President Trump did not relate to the justice system at all—for instance, it criticized Trump for describing Haiti and African countries as 'shithole countries.'"] From Ninth Circuit Judge Michelle Friedland's opinion today in Crowe v. [read post]
