Search for: "Mitchell v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2008, 4:51 am
In its scramble, the agency made the momentous decision to use harsh methods the United States had long condemned. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
After nearly two weeks, the plaintiff was transferred back to Avery-Mitchell. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
United States Travis Price, a South Carolina man whose charges were dropped after police body camera footage showed he did not fight an officer who attacked him is suing the city of Rock Hill and U.S Rep. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by JB
Sherwin, Gambling with Armageddon: Nuclear Roulette from Hiroshima to the Cuban Missile Crisis (Knopf, 2020).February 7, 2021Balkinization Symposium on  Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In a lengthy, thoughtful August 29, 2017 opinion in S.M. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In a lengthy, thoughtful August 29, 2017 opinion in S.M. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
In conclusion, the unanimous court observed: Wayne Jones was killed just over one year before the Ferguson, Missouri shooting of Michael Brown would once again draw national scrutiny to police shootings of black people in the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
United States Soccer Federation denies extending antitrust immunity to USSF in regulating professional soccer, 18 SPORTS LAWYERS JOURNAL 325 (2011)Caitlin M. [read post]