Search for: "NAACP v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2025, 9:30 am
As ostensibly private law arrangements, racial covenants escaped constitutional constraints until 1948, when Shelley v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:07 am
But the appellate court held that this [final restraining order (FRO)] was unconstitutional, and I think this was correct, given NAACP v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
To the contrary, the NAACP and other progressive groups opposed it in Congress – and for a very good reason. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
As the Supreme Court has previously said, viewpoint discrimination is when the state is “attempting to give one group an advantage over another in the marketplace of ideas,” and that’s just not what the disparagement bar is. [read post]
19 May 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court case of Hansberry v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
Supreme Court case of Hansberry v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:11 am
Other partners include the district's Title V/CSHCN program. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 9:15 pm
" Pennsylvania Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 7:27 am
In February 2025, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger asked U.S. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
Sponsors for the Clippers pulled their names from the Staples Center and suspended advertisements (including CarMax, State Farm, and Kia Motors among others), the team itself protested at the beginning of the first playoff game by wearing their warm-up jerseys inside-out, and black socks during the game, the NAACP preemptively revoked Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In 2003, in Grutter v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
So you went to law school right as a generation of legal thinkers was persuading people, bit by bit, that both judicial activism and restraint were misguided, and that courts can and must enforce constitutional limits on the state. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
That is more the function of state Supreme Court judges dealing with issues of state constitutional, statutory and common law, and even they are frequently constrained by federal constitutional law and federal preemption of state law. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
His work is going towards First Amendment because the other alternatives won’t get the job done and the present solution risks a serious chill.53 cell phone search cases found in his search for reported opinions after Arizona v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
The H-S revealed that the organization e-mailed the state NAACP to complain that “the implications and intentions of this research at the hands of our very own prestigious faculty, seemingly without a genuine concern for proactively furthering the well-being of the black community is hurtful and alienating. [read post]
