Search for: "Nerds in Court"
Results 741 - 760
of 886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm
(Dalia Ramirez, Nerd Wallet). [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
No, he’s not a lawyer, but hey, he writes for Ars, so shouldn’t he be explaining law to nerds? [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm
Because an unconstitutional law is no law at all,Defendant Edward Myers shall go hence without day.And for you grammar nerds, check out footnote one of the opinion:Many courts and commentators, especially in the passagesquoted herein, render the possessive of "Congress" as "Congress'. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
The damning language from the court's opinion relates to the issue of a state law negligence claim its relation to the FFIEC Guidelines. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:02 am
Under the government’s demand that it be given everything, the government leaves the Court with only two options: deny the warrants — thus depriving the government of needed information — or issue warrants that are repugnant to the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
So after about 20 hours of research and dissecting all the transactions (remember, I'm a novice at all of this plus a bit of a research nerd), I filed a motion to dismiss, and I'll be in court next month to argue it. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Law nerds (that means both of our readers) take note: lost among all the headlines was the fact that the opinion contains great language about not construing ambiguous language to be jurisdictional. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:04 am
I’m going to get into the minutiae of the opinion, so unless you are a hardcore domain name/trademark nerd, you should probably stop reading here. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:27 am
Still, as Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote, “Wisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
Does NSA also have to explain in court exactly how it achieved the goal, or provide its experts for cross-examination? [read post]
20 Sep 2006, 7:31 pm
This concept, the book argues, applies to courts as well. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:42 pm
After all, the government is just submitting the application; it's the court's order if the court signs on. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:31 am
(Well, ok, but the decision was a big deal for us law nerds.) [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
To a property owners' lawyer, and an admitted property law nerd, to participate in this conference is like a baseball fan being offered the chance for an at-bat at Yankee Stadium in October. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
As Fourth Amendment nerds know, the law of reasonableness often applies differently in these four settings. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:24 am
Reg. 67978 (pdf) From what I can tell, no court has yet interpreted this change in the regulations. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Readers curious about whether a particular cosplayer who dresses as a character other than for “comic effect or ridicule” are encouraged to read Nerds in Court co-founder Christina Evola’s ASCAP award winning article “The Next Generation of Costumes and Conventions: Is Cosplay Copyright Infringement? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 8:10 am
Pepsi preemptively sued Leonard in its home court of SDNY. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:48 am
" http://pjblack.me/U5AvZK "What you can and can't say on social networking sites" http://pjblack.me/U5At4j "Online rants land Facebook and Twitter users in legal trouble" http://pjblack.me/Wn82Dh a profile of garion hall: "Girls on film: Australia's 'reality porn' king" http://pjblack.me/U5zdOD this is fun: "Intelligent Coca Cola Vending Machine Rewards Great Dance Moves With Free… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Readers curious about whether a particular cosplayer who dresses as a character other than for “comic effect or ridicule” are encouraged to read Nerds in Court co-founder Christina Evola’s ASCAP award winning article “The Next Generation of Costumes and Conventions: Is Cosplay Copyright Infringement? [read post]
