Search for: "OLIVER v. STATE" Results 741 - 760 of 1,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
., Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Northwest Territories have all found these provisions as unconstitutional, culminating in the Supreme Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
  Brendan Sullivan’s virulent, scorched-earth defense of Oliver North during the televised Iran/Contra hearings is the exception that proves the rule: in addition to the fact that Colonel North as a client offered his lawyers advantages and disadvantages peculiar only to Colonel North, Sullivan made a considered tactical decision that high-profile aggression was the appropriate tack in that particular public theater. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
” In Virginia: Oliver Elsworth (the second Chief Justice): “This Constitution defines the extent of the powers of the general government. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Oliver Proust discusses the developments for the Fieldfisher Privacy and Information Law Blog here. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am by Jani
As the court stated, reiterating Lord Justice Oliver in Anheuser-Buch v Budejovicky Budvar NP, that goodwill is very much "localized" and that "...reputation which may, no doubt, and frequently does, exist without any supporting local business… does not by itself constitute a property which the law protects". [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
Mr Oliver (Counsel for VCI) properly disavowed that he was a document: the repository of information must be inanimate: neither a person nor A.P. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In the Anheuser-Busch case, the importation from the USA of bottled beer under the BUDWEISER mark for use and sale in US military and diplomatic establishments within the UK did not entitle the plaintiff to establish what Lord Oliver later stated was the first element of a passing off claim. [read post]