Search for: "Paris v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Paris. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 3:25 pm
In AEP v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
Perry intercalates abundant (and delightful) quotations from 18th century cases with his own discussion as he makes valuable points concerning the current debate on copyright rationale and scope.Part V “The lore of courts”Shubha Ghosh, in Chapter 10, “‘If Music Did Not Pay’: The State Court Roots of Justice Holmes’ Intellectual Property Jurisprudence”, considers IP decisions by Justice Holmes, when he was still serving on the Massachusetts… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:46 pm
Dupuy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris - Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris – Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
Slip Op. 01096(3d Dept.,2021) Respondent Paris H. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 9:40 am
D’Aubigny v Khan & Anor (2025) EWCA Civ 11 (Not on Bailii yet, a copy of the judgment is here.) [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:08 pm
On April 12, 2011, the European Court of Justice ruled in DHL Express France SAS v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:36 am
Shawe v Elting, C.A. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Gear, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Paris prosecutors opened their own inquiry into the claims. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:35 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
Unlike in the field of financial insolvency procedures, there is no process for imposing a moratorium on claims with a view to ensuring that they are all accommodated fairly and equally on a pari passu basis. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am
The BLM itself in 1978 issued an explanatory pamphlet stating that the annual filings were to be made "on or before December 31" of each year. [read post]
