Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am
The dissent is notable, if only for the fact the President of the court, Lord Neuberger, and Lord Sumption are the two dissenters. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
But what did Lord Wilson actually say? [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Mance, however, did state that although this was an inappropriate case in which to decide the proper approach to the defence of illegality, there was a need for review of the law of illegality by the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Lords Neuberger and Lord Reed disagreed. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm
Alternatively, Article 8 rights were engaged, as the tenants would be unable to remain in their existing accommodation, as per Lord Dyson (MR) in R (JS) v Secretary of Sta [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Lord Denning in Miller v Jackson Also in the 1970s, English judge Lord Denning wrote one of his most famous judgments in a case that involved a dispute over cricket balls being hit out of a village cricket ground onto a neighboring property. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
Lady Hale, Lord Reed and Lord Hughes concurred in both judgments. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
Parliament has further expressly provided, in sections 15 and 35, for disabled people to have rights in respect of the accommodation which they occupy which are different from and extra to the rights of non-disabled people. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
” When my U.S. history class studied Miranda v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
” - Lloyd v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
The emails were distributed to 28 UK Hindu temples, members of the House of Lords, MPs and others. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Data Protection and Data Privacy European regulators need to further control civilian drone use, according to a paper released by a House of Lords committee. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
” [51] Lord Toulson in the sole dissenting opinion found the interference with the right to privacy to be disproportionate. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
TM argued, relying on what Lord Denning said in Kanda v Government of Malaya [1962] AC 322, 337-338, that it was unfair for an adjudicatory body to receive evidence or representations from one side behind the back of another. [read post]
