Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 741 - 760 of 178,205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm by Caroline E. Oks
” The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claim, arguing in pertinent part that a class action was not necessary to vindicate the plaintiffs’ interests and, in any event, that the leases contained class action waivers that were valid and enforceable. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm by Caroline E. Oks
” The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claim, arguing in pertinent part that a class action was not necessary to vindicate the plaintiffs’ interests and, in any event, that the leases contained class action waivers that were valid and enforceable. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm by Caroline E. Oks
” The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claim, arguing in pertinent part that a class action was not necessary to vindicate the plaintiffs’ interests and, in any event, that the leases contained class action waivers that were valid and enforceable. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Puzzlingly, the court did find state law dilution plausibly pled because plaintiffs alleged that “Venkateswaran acted with hostility to Sundaresan’s and Portkey’s marks” and thus had predatory intent. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:12 pm by David Klein
In response to Plaintiffs Complaint, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss alleging that Plaintiff lacked standing and failed to state a claim. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 10:47 am by Chris Williams
The plaintiff's suit is like if RBG's answer was 'When there are 11.' The post Suit Alleges Anti-White Bias In Tax Law Hiring Despite Virtually All Tax Lawyers Being White appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:59 am by Kathryn Rubino
Plaintiff says he's owed $50,000 in overtime wages. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 7:16 am by Eric Goldman
Blog post recapping the Preliminary Injunction Hearing Against Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief to Florida’s Opposition. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:53 am by jordan
This could lead to a reduction in the plaintiffs awarded compensation. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
That is, revelations about the plaintiffs misconduct arose during the same two-month period. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Here plaintiff's employment was terminated for inappropriate touching of female students. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:56 am by jonathanturley
Once he was blocked, Plaintiff could no longer view, reply to, or retweet any of @UOEquity’s posts…. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:34 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
In the period between the end of the waiting period and the insurer’s incapacity decision there occurred a policy anniversary which increased the cover by $107 064.80 which the court found the insured was entitled to receive.The construction of the policy was such that a claim under the own occupation temporary disability cover required the establishment of the following: That the plaintiff had suffered a sickness or injury while working in regular employment for income; … [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm by Meredith Ervine
 The court found that, even if the Plaintiffs alleged facts supported reasonable inferences that the Board had known about and failed to respond to the Company’s compliance problems, no facts were alleged that supported an inference that the Board failed to respond in bad faith. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:26 pm by Patricia Salkin
As the court explained, it was clear that the plaintiffs had not received a final decision regarding the revocation of their permit since they conceded in their complaint that their appeal from the building inspector’s decision remained pending before the town’s zoning board of appeals. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 5:40 pm by Steven Gallagher
  However, if the audit was conducted through counsel, such emails can be protected from disclosure, and you can avoid giving a roadmap to an eager plaintiffs attorney. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:17 pm by Mark S. Goldstein and Brianna Schmid
The court also noted that it intends to issue a decision regarding the ultimate merits of the case – i.e., the plaintiffs request for a permanent, nationwide injunction of the final rule – by August 30, 2024. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm by Reference Staff
It was the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 1:34 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
The court also denied the plaintiffs request for an injunction prohibiting enforcement of the non-compete ban because the plaintiff did not have a likelihood of success on the merits. [read post]