Search for: "Posner v. Posner"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
Coupled with Judge Posner's recent opinion in Parko v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 2:37 am
Coupled with Judge Posner’s recent opinion in Parko v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:16 am
Adding to this debate is a recent Seventh Circuit decision, Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 3:12 am
By Dennis Crouch Vederi v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:20 am
In a good reminder about the importance of legal analysis, Judge Posner had some choice words for the attorneys who filed the opening brief in the case of Central States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:25 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:12 pm
The appellate hearing in the "Posner" Apple v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 3:01 pm
Amzak Capital Mgmt. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:54 am
Will Baude has two posts on U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:21 am
Eric Posner looks at the growing crisis in Ukraine in a series of posts; Brian Leiter has a poll on New York Times v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
Posner’s concession about abortion proves that. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:10 pm
Posner and Alan O. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Session 2: The Product Market DimensionRobert Burrell: why do we treat territorial and product markets so differently? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:40 am
(There are two ways to abandon the commands, but one is called Article V, and the other one is called “revolution. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:47 am
At least for now, the appeals court held, Notre Dame failed to show the regulations worked a substantial burden on its religious faith (University of Notre Dame v Sebelius, February 21, 2014, Posner, R). [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
In University of Notre Dame v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
Flores-Lopez (Posner, J.). [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
In Apple v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:47 pm
It's interesting that Jeff posted an entry about Judge Posner's concurrence in United States v. [read post]
