Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD"
Results 741 - 760
of 72,235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 12:59 pm
For example, in EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 11:00 am
“VEEVA SYSTEMS INC. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
This is recorded by historians, as well as the brass plaques that depict European travellers. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
Fearrington v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:55 am
” On this point, the majority opinion repeatedly referred to Zauderer v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:43 am
Read the opinion The post THOMAS LEROY BROWN v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:41 am
Read the opinion The post BRANDON LEON SHIELDS v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:38 am
Read the opinion The post ISAIAH DARIUS FOGG v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:34 am
RAYMOND BROWN, JR. appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:27 am
Read the opinion The post CHARLENE MCCORMICK v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
MRO, a “national medical records provider,” conducted a search for medical records at Hollabaugh’s request; failing to find responsive records, MRO charged her a $22.88 […] The post JANICE HOLLABAUGH v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Rockey v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court has given the press added “breathing room” with the higher standard of proof found in cases such as New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
Nicklin J at first instance in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2019] EWHC 970 (QB)). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
When the Kings County Supreme Court concurred, and dismissed the case, an appeal ensued.Interestingly, on its review, the Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that there were deficiencies in the record which warranted reversal.Among other things, the defendants’ climatological records weren’t certified, and they failed to unequivocally establish that there was a “storm in progress” at the time of SA’s fall.Given those evidentiary gaps, the AD2… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:37 pm
” Galbreath v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:14 pm
[An important case on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"] Regular readers may recall my prior coverage of United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm
The fear of a retaliatory prosecution is no illusion: The authors examine a recent Texas case, Villarreal v. [read post]
