Search for: "Res-Care, Inc. v. United States"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
It’s not like we’re from different planets… we grew up in the same neighborhood, for heaven’s sake. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
It’s not retaliation against him, though, because he claims the address actually belongs to a “United States Judge” (by which he means a state judge, even though any lawyer would interpret that as a reference to a federal judge), and that I am PUTTING A JUDGE IN DANGER. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:13 am
” Humana, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
June 1); In re Chmura, 608 N.W.2d 31, 40 (Mich. 2000); Mahan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
June 1); In re Chmura, 608 N.W.2d 31, 40 (Mich. 2000); Mahan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
United Services Auto. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
” Now, you might be thinking… oh, big deal, who cares? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
Coming back to Propecia, the warning label in the United States didn’t mention until June of this year, but the warning labels in the United Kingdom have said for some time: In addition, the following have been reported in postmarketing use: persistence of erectile dysfunction after discontinuation of treatment with PROPECIA; male breast cancer (see 4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use) Propecia in Sweden and Italy has similar warnings. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:59 am
Manor Care of Florida, Inc. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:52 am
Bielskis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
The Second Circuit invalidates the FCC’s indecency policy in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
Mutuality Really two separate questions, be very careful not to confuse them. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
" Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
-Scott Clements, Reserve Studies Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 3:40 am
Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decision, Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
