Search for: "Robert B Thomas" Results 741 - 760 of 1,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Estate/Will/Trust Inheritance ContestsDo you think youre entitled to money or might be entitled to money from an estate or trust? [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Estate/Will/Trust Inheritance ContestsFOR POTENTIAL CLIENTS TO CONTACT US DURING NON-BUSINESS HOURS, PLEASE FILL OUT THE FORM.Name:Cell Phone:E-Mail AddressIf You Do Not Include a Complete E-Mail Address, Network will not Forward Your Contact Form to the Law Office.Details of the CaseAgreeBy typing " agree" into the box you are confirming that you wish to send your information to the Law Office of Kenneth VWrite the characters in the image aboveDo you think youre entitled to money or might… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Thus, recipes are functional directions for achieving a result and are excluded from copyright protection under 17 U.S.C. 102(b)" adding for good measure "Certainly plaintiffs cannot be suggesting that somehow the copyright prevents defendants from serving chicken salad sandwiches". [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by The Blog Team
Williams was represented by a team of attorneys including: Gregory Davis from the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Middle District of North Carolina; Amber Will, Patricia Roberts, Brittany Sadler, and Andrew Steinberg from the William & Mary School of Law; and Tillman Breckenridge and Thomas Ports, Jr., from Reed Smith LLP. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm by Rory Little
 That is, if the instructions required a finding of both A and B, and Musacchio now objects to the sufficiency only of B, then if the jury “said both are true,” A must have been sufficiently proven. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am by Evan Lee
” Thus, both Alito and Roberts seem to be persuaded that the government should win based on what might be labeled a “tracking” theory – that Congress meant in Section 2252(b)(2) to “track” similar language elsewhere that everyone agrees covers convictions involving both adults and minors. [read post]