Search for: "SANDERS v. STATE" Results 741 - 760 of 1,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm by Schachtman
  The Supreme Court recognized this connection in General Electric v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
I am sure that the possible effect of the Morrison v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:47 am by traceydennis
High Court (Administrative Court) Hussain & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Health Department [2010] EWHC 3351 (Admin) (20 December 2010) Infocus Public Networks Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2010] EWHC 3309 (Admin) (17 December 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Ashdale Land and Property Company Ltd v Maioriello & Ors [2010] EWHC 3296 (Ch) (20 December 2010) Macaria… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:04 pm
Workers’ compensation leaveSanders v NYC Human Resources Administration, 275 AD2d 873Lavern Sanders, a probationary employee, filed an application for workers’ compensation benefits. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Sanders Anesthesia Group, P.C., 897 S.W.2d 270 (Tenn. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/826196.co1.pdf State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:42 am by John Hochfelder
Worthen-Caldwell's attorney argued that $1,860,000 was a reasonable award in view of the $11,500,000 verdict in the case of Sanders v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by Mark Zamora
In June 2007, at Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center in Knoxville, Tennessee, Plaintiff had a spinal cord simulation system device implanted. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am by Aaron
However, Justice Sanders wrote separately to disagree with the lead opinion’s reliance on State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:03 am by Jeff Gamso
  In fact, the Supreme Court held, in Mills v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:11 am by Kelly
Becton-Dickinson (Patent Docs) US government intervenes in patentability of genes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inovia) (BlawgIT) (IP Osgoode) US: BIO and AUTM fire back at gene patent foes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) US: IPO files amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) US: AIPLA submits amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Summary of… [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 11:25 am by constitutional lawblogger
Steve Sanders has posted an interesting commentary on the amicus brief filed by thirteen states in Perry v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:57 am by pittlegalscholarship
UCLA Richard Sander (UCLA Law) presents “The Misunderstood Consequences of Shelly v. [read post]