Search for: "SEC v. Downe"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a comprehensive and complex agreement. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Courts must defer to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations in its area of expertiseAbramoski v New York State Educ. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
” Gertz v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:14 pm
Market goes up claims go down. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:07 am
Richards v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:57 pm
The three-judge panel had twice struck down the SEC’s requirement that companies post these disclosures on their websites as a violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:18 pm
If you’re with an investment advisor, your investment advisor is being regulated by the SEC. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:34 pm
In the Top 10, Wystan Ackerman breaks down the oral arguments in the big Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:30 pm
But if that doesn’t work they move down the line and the last person they go to is Main Street. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
No disclosure has ever been struck down under Zauderer. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/hrhDHmkcVh -> AM v Toronto Police Service, A presumption of notice to the media for anonymization applications? [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The SLB also touches on the Rule 14a-8(i)(7) litigation playing out in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
In Raul v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/hrhDHmkcVh -> AM v Toronto Police Service, A presumption of notice to the media for anonymization applications? [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
Sorrell didn’t touch the false/misleading v. nonmisleading commercial speech distinction, though, and as long as that’s in place it’s possible to justify a slimmed-down ROP. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Breyer concurrence: result will be watering down of strict scrutiny, which is not so good. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
& Sec. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 7:15 am
The group said its members would bear the adverse consequences of striking the preemption provision, a result sought by the states of Montana and Massachusetts in their suit against the SEC (Lindeen v. [read post]
