Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
By Shannon LandrethThe Indiana Supreme Court issued four opinions in February 2010, two of which addressed related issues.In State ex rel. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:32 pm
Mississippi ex rel. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:33 pm
According to the Court of Appeal in People ex rel. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” He cited four privacy cases – McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73; HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] Ch 57; Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103; and Murray v Express Newspapers [2009] Ch 481 – where the House of Lords had refused to grant permission to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
The trial court rejected plaintiff's Batson argument on this point, and the Court of Appeals rules the district court's determination was not an abuse of discretion. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
The Court of Appeals rejected that claim. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
The Court of Appeals rejected that claim. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:54 am
The court referred to the four factors that help determine the work relationship set forth in Wilkinson ex rel. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
The Eighth District Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the trial court’s ruling, holding that Article II, Section 34 of the Ohio Constitution did not give the General Assembly power to enact R.C. 9.75 and that the statute infringed upon the municipal home-rule authority granted in Article XVIII, Section 3. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:22 pm
Spain), homophobic jokes (Sousa Goucha v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the state’s power to do so because that candidate could not serve in the office during the term for which the election was being held (see art. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the state’s power to do so because that candidate could not serve in the office during the term for which the election was being held (see art. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am
In any case, the General Court in NEYMAR did not base its decision on any rebuttable presumption of bad faith. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
State ex. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:48 pm
However, with United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Rel PolyOne Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:46 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 10:56 am
In support of her argument appellant cited State ex rel. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:41 am
Gray ex rel. [read post]
