Search for: "STATE v. PATRON"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
May 16, 2018) the court rejected a motion to dismiss claiming that pleadings “on information and belief” were not sufficient to state a claim. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Wong v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
Testers would go out and pretend to be interested in buying or renting or patronizing a business to see how they were treated. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:09 am
Guerrero v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:05 am
See Judy v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:35 am
A more recent case, Troxel v. [read post]
Precedential No. 15: TTAB Refuses Concurrent Use Registration of DELMONICO'S For Restaurant Services
15 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
Southwestern Management, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
In McCulloch, for example, if Maryland had not imposed a targeted tax on the Bank of the United States, but instead had targeted employees or patrons of the Bank with a special tax, does anyone think the result would be any different? [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:27 am
See General Electric Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:34 am
And yet, such communities have begun to suggest that though they are bit players in a larger drama (from the perspective fo their patrons in New York, Geneva, and elsewhere), they are preparing to declare their independence and to press what may eventually become a counter narrative to that for which they are being used. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:21 am
While the opinion in Kirton v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:00 am
Sohm v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 2:35 pm
As we learned from the case of Kreimer v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 2:09 pm
United States of America, which is currently on appeal. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
In July 2003, there was a close call with a patron, and in 2004, Ms. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
Local Law 5 defines drive-through windows as “windows which allow for service of food and other services or product from a window in a structure which allows for such service without the patron leaving his or her vehicle” and states that such windows are “hereby prohibited in the [222-acre Architectural Overlay District]. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:11 am
Recently, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, in the case of Burton v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:22 am
Having received the state high court’s answers to those questions, the Second Circuit determined that, because shift supervisors did not have a “substantial” degree of “managerial responsibility,” they were akin to general wait staff and entitled to participate in the tip pool (Barenboim v Starbucks Corp, November 21, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
