Search for: "STATE v. SULLIVAN"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
Sullivan (1964), when the Supreme Court constitutionalized defamation law, the United States has struck the balance between public debate and legitimate reputational interests of public figures more heavily in favor of public debate than in any other country. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
See Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 9:03 am
" That case is Powell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm
” Plaintiffs state that they live near their respective Defendants’ stores and have been customers “on prior occasions. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
In the Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
SULLIVAN, J., concurs. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Sullivan. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
Fifty years ago, in New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
LAWRENCE, J.P., and SULLIVAN and HARWOOD, JJ., concur. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:58 am
We argue in the brief that even if a state can be permitted to enact anticompetitive laws under Parker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) James Lewis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
Sullivan, 891 F.2d 185, 190 (7th Cir. 1989). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:32 am
The dismissal of Sullivan’s suit for lack of jurisdiction represents almost two years of litigation up in smoke, forcing him to start anew presumably in New York state court. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:58 am
.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 10:53 am
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memo by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.) [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:59 am
Div. 1978); State v. [read post]
