Search for: "SY" Results 741 - 760 of 3,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division explained that the Trustees' Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious, citing Matter of Solomonoff v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 188 AD3d 700. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:05 am
All relevant medical records must be considered in making a determination regarding an application for accidental disability retirement benefits Baird v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 2012 NY Slip Op 05053, Appellate Division, Third Department Darlene A. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:12 am
Termination pay and other compensation paid in anticipation of an employee’s retirement excluded in determining the individual’s final average salaryMatter of Thompson v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 2010 NY Slip Op 08670, November 24, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJames R. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
Extraordinary salary increases excluded in determining the individual’s final average salary for retirement purposes.Matter of Palandra v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 011 NY Slip Op 04357, Appellate Division, Third Department  Maria Palandra was employed by the Elmont Union Free School District and eventually became its superintendent of schools. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:33 am
Sys., 35 A.D.3d 1005, 826 N.Y.S.2d 481 Observing that when a position classification decision is made, "[t]he courts have the power to reverse or modify a particular classification . . . [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm by David P. Schwarz
As my colleague Winiviere Sy has previously noted, the Hopper case is as contentious as it is complex. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 pm by admin
  This case will be consolidated with the two British Columbia indirect purchaser price-fixing cases scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court in October (Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd., et al. v. [read post]