Search for: "Seales v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2010, 8:06 am by Andrew Russell
On Wednesday, Judge Stark issued what looks to be his first order signed as a United States District Judge (at least the first to be posted to the Court's website): Allergan Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The problem is that cutting off the states and cities and leaving them to suffer for their supposed irresponsibility will hurt everyone in every state and city, because when states cut services and lay off workers, that has direct impacts and ripple effects that harm us all, everywhere in the country—a country that already has Depression-level unemployment and is getting worse every day.Moreover, the presumption that the Republican-led states are the… [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:34 am
" Does this mean that in these sealed cases, even the existence of the case on appeal will be sealed -- i.e. a secret docket? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:43 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells’s oral argument preview is available here, while you can view Ben’s unusually brief argument recap here (the judges sealed the courtroom just before beginning oral arguments) and access the briefs here. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Whilst the case had been ordered by a Master to be transferred to a County Court the Claimant remained in ignorance of this due to delay in sealing and service of the order. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have signed this proclamation and caused the Seal of the United States of America to be affixed. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:19 pm by Kim Zetter
Under California law, the public has a right to see the documents that led San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
  But the answer remains sealed until 2059. [read post]