Search for: "State v Casey" Results 741 - 760 of 1,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
Casey, and Whole Woman's Health, but that so long as those cases were not overruled, he's going to follow stare decisis on smaller points. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
  Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
  Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
State, 47 So. 3d 297, 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
State, 47 So. 3d 297, 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:32 am by Bonnie Shucha
A salient example is the case of Dickerson versus United States, where the Court considered the precedential status of Miranda v Arizona. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court rejected the individual’s claim that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under Education Law §3020-a, and the award terminating petitioner's employment is a violation of public policy and New York State Law.Perry v Comm. of Labor, App. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Shultz Former Secretary of State   General Michael V. [read post]