Search for: "State v. Douglas"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
In Douglas v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 12:54 pm
Douglas Heeder Federated Serv. [read post]
Law - "Supreme Court to Hear Arguments Next Week in States' Challenge to 'Preemption' of Regulation"
25 Nov 2006, 9:20 am
The case, Watters v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the First Amendment [Concurrences: Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
It was energizing to see that you saw the emergence of a children’s civil rights movement and you even championed Justice Douglas’s concurrence in Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:28 pm
Independent Sch Dist No 281 v Minnesota Dept of Educ 48 IDELR 222 (Minn Ct App 2007) See, Letter to Douglas 35 IDELR 278 (OSEP 4/19/2001); OSEP Q & A Document on Dispute Resolution Procedures 61 IDELR 232 (OSEP 7/23/2013) (See Question B-9) I'm wondering how well the state complaint procedures address these systemic issues in the states. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 2:14 pm
Adams won in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 5:16 am
From Hershey v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:10 am
Douglas S. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
McDonald v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am
Brown) and Windsor v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 5:09 am
Zinn won in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:50 am
The first opinion of the day was in Douglas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:30 am
See, e.g., Morgan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
In 2003, California lawmakers enacted Labor Code Section 1102.6, setting forth a framework for whistleblower retaliation claims that varied from the burden-shifting test established by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
At the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at the big picture, with brief previews of the issues that could affect states, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times previews Holt v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
Douglas Jarrett of Keller and Heckman in Beyond Telecom Law Blog Will SoftBank’s Windfall from Alibaba Be Enough for Sprint to Buy T-Mobile? [read post]
